Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

Key Features of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law
Do any special regimes apply in specific sectors?

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code covers all corporate entities except financial services entities (eg, banks, insurers and pension funds). Otherwise, there are no special regimes applicable in specific sectors.

As yet, there is also no special regime for financial services entities. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allows the government, in consultation with the financial services regulators, to notify financial service providers (FSPs) or categories of FSPs for the purpose of insolvency and liquidation proceedings in such manner as may be prescribed.

The government recently notified certain rules to establish a generic framework for insolvency and liquidation proceedings for systemically important FSPs (other than banks). The rules shall apply to such FSPs/categories of FSPs as will be notified by the government, and provide that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code shall also apply to insolvency and liquidation proceedings involving such FSPs, subject to certain modifications. This special framework will serve as an interim mechanism pending the introduction of dedicated insolvency legislation for banks and other systemically important FSPs.

Is the restructuring and insolvency regime in your jurisdiction perceived to be more creditor friendly or debtor friendly?

Prior to the enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the regime was perceived to be debtor friendly. However, the code has changed the applicable regime from a debtor in control regime to a creditor in possession regime.

Once a debtor is admitted to insolvency, its board of directors is suspended and the management of the debtor is vested in an independent insolvency professional appointed by the bankruptcy tribunal. The insolvency professional can be replaced by the creditors and will manage the proceedings under the overall supervision of the creditors. As a result of this change, the insolvency and restructuring regime is perceived to be more creditor friendly.

Benefits of restructuring

The benefits of restructuring proceedings under the Companies Act from the debtor's perspective include the following:

  • This is a voluntary mechanism which allows the debtor itself to propose the scheme.
  • There are no prescribed disqualifications and no competitive bidding process (which may result in a takeover of the debtor by a third party).
  • The law in respect of schemes is well settled and there is thus limited regulatory uncertainty.
  • Once a scheme has been sanctioned, it is binding on all creditors (whose debts are being restructured).

The drawbacks include the following:

  • The non-availability of a moratorium.
  • The relatively high approval threshold.
  • The lack of a time-bound process.
  • The inability to achieve a cross-class cramdown.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

Patent Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution

The introduction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in December 2016, coupled with swift legislative changes (by way of various timely amendments) and fast-evolving jurisprudence (in the form of landmark case law), has given a significant boost to the restructuring and insolvency landscape in India.

The latest amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, introduced in August 2019, gave the creditors' committee the freedom to decide on the distribution of value proposed under resolution plans, which may take into account the order of priority among creditors, including the priority and value of security interests of secured creditors.

Credit bidding is not specifically addressed in the existing insolvency and restructuring legal framework. Generally, the treatment of a security interest under a resolution plan is a matter of negotiation between the resolution applicant and the secured creditor(s). However, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code permits a financial creditor to be a resolution applicant and even to vote on the resolution plan in the capacity of a creditors' committee member.

A resolution plan submitted by a secured financial creditor may contain provisions on credit bidding. However, the consideration of any such resolution plan by the creditors' committee will hinge on whether the plan meets the mandatory conditions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and applicable regulations.

Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the debtor's directors can be held liable for ‘fraudulent trading' and ‘wrongful trading'. The wrongful trading provisions deal with directors' liability for acts or omissions in the zone of insolvency.

The provisions state that the resolution professional can apply to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for an order against a director to contribute to the debtor's assets if, before the insolvency commencement date

The director knew or ought to have known that there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding the commencement of a corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of the debtor.

Contact Us Now!